Posted by GireeshHi All,
Mathrubhumi weekly is running a debate on Modernism and Postmodernism. It's titled 'Swargam Theernnupokunnu, Narakam nilanilkkunnu'. Though I couldn't get many of its issues I read some of them. The one which was written by K.P Nirmalkumar made really an interesting reading. It's titled"KSHOBHICHAVARKKORU SHRADYAM". What a title!
His article is a revelation. Or is it a confession? He takes both the sides. How the traditional critics were insensitive to modernism and at the sametime how fake literature flooded in the name of postmodernism.
Though modernism generated some of the finest pieces of writing in Malayalam literature, postmodernism failed drastically there. Vijayan, Mukundan and Kakkanadan were the rising stars of modernism. They continued writing andmade their own niche in Malayalam literature. But in case of postmodernism, it went no where. It seems Methil stopped writing. Nirmal Kumar follows.
I didn't read much work of Nirmal Kumar. But still recall the times backwhen he wrote some of his 'Gautala Jara' stories in Mathrubhumi weekly. It was a different kind of story telling.
Many participants echoed that original writings can't be tied to any 'Isams'. Probably, that sums up the whole discussion.
Regards
Gireesh Kumar P
------------------------
Response from Kalyan KumarDear Friends,
It was very exciting to know that Mathrubhumi weekly has entrusted the defence of modernism to KP Nirmal Kumar. In Malayalam, modernismis now tied to the seat belts of some writers like Vijayan,Mukaundan, Anand and Kakanadan.
And the damage was that instead of evolving as a concerte period in the literary history of Malyalam, these so called isms became accolades for the craft of some of these well read writers who had better exposure than some of their counterparts who were based in kerala.
But I think, we need to see the concepts of modernism and post-modernism on a historical and global perspective.
Modernism, is the movement in visual arts, music, literature, and drama that rejected the old Victorian standards on how art should be made, consumed and what it should stand for.
The period of high modernism is from 1910-1930, when the major figures of modernism radically redefined what poetry and fiction should be. Thus in European literature figures like Woolf, JamesJoyce, T.S Eliot, Ezra Pound, Thomas Stevens, Proust, Mallarme,Kafka and Rilke became the cult figures of twentieth-century modernism.
In its writings, Modernism tends to present a fragmented view of human subjectivity and history (Eg: T. S Eliot's Wasteland) where he presents the fragmentation of human life as something very tragic and abominable and mourns it as a loss.
Modernists uphold the idea that works of art can provide the unity,coherence and meaning which are fast losing out of human life in modern times. Only art can fill that vacuum better than any other human institution.
However, Postmodernism, never laments the fragmentation, provisionality or incoherence in human life but says that you have to accept it as it is and rather celebrate it. If the world is meaningless- so what? Let us not pretend that art can make any valuable addition to it and just play with that nonsense.
Another view point is that modernism and postmodernism are cultural formations that have accompanied particular stages of capitalism.Market capitalism, which occurred in the late 19 century in WesternEurope, England and the United States, is associated with particular technological developments, namely steam-driven motors and that brought in a particular kind of aesthetics, namely, realism.
The second phase occurred from the late nineteenth century until the mid-twentieth century as monopoly capitalism and had electric and internal combustion motors as technology and ushered in modernism.
The third phase or the current one is multinational with emphasis onmarketing, and consumerism and not on producing them. This is associated with nuclear and electronic technologies and has postmodernism as its aesthetic guide.
Now the larger question comes, in this capitalist evolution, where does Kerala stand to be ready to bracket itself in modernist or post-modern schools.
Best Regards,
G. Kalyan Kumar